<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Pillars of ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL started out as just the books, but it is much more today: it is a movement, a professional group, and an industry.  A great deal of activity goes on in promotion and support of ITIL worldwide.  Much of it is ungoverned and ad-hoc.  There are many pillars of the house of ITIL and OGC governs and manages only four.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:53:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1262 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How is ITIL Live doing?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-itil-live-doing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how the ITIL Live website is doing.  And where they get their customers from.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/how-itil-live-doing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-itil-live-doing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:21:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1259 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Un-Common Language</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/un-common-language</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[A guest post today from long-time reader Alison Adams with more feedback from the field on ITIL V3 exam questions:]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How confident are you in identifying the difference/s between a stated AIM, a PURPOSE, a GOAL and an OBJECTIVE ? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A dictionary might not help much, look them up in dictionary.com, they reference one another in a complete circle. Even the official ITIL glossary includes -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Objective: the defined purpose or aim of a Process and Activity or an Organisation…..&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/un-common-language&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/un-common-language#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:43:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alison Adams</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1252 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Setting the target goal for service management initiatives </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When we want to know how to, say, measure a service desk, we can find quite exact guidance everywhere.  But it seems to me the depth and specificity (specifity?  specificness?) and usefulness of advice is inversely proportional to the importance of the question.  Consider the most important question we need answered in a service management initiative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:05:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1234 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alerts: Strong Commitment to ITIL3, 72% trained, 94% planning, 89% predictable costs....</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunrisesoftware.co.uk/main/news_item.php?news_item=151&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;An ITIL V3 report&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunrisesoftware.co.uk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Sunrise Software&lt;/a&gt; is rich in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130&quot;&gt;crap factoids&lt;/a&gt;, since the report itself suffers from all the methodological deficiencies &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&quot;&gt;we have described before&lt;/a&gt;.   Mercifully this one may not get much airtime so we rate the risk Medium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:24:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1230 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where does continual service improvement end?  An important ITIL question</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Service Management is always on about Continual Service Improvement, as if this was a holy grail and an assumed permanent state of change.  What seems inadequately discussed is where does it end?  Do we improve forever?   Surely not.   We must encounter diminishing returns until eventually we are just gilding the lily.  Is the &quot;to-be&quot; always different from the &quot;as-is&quot;?  or rather is it always sufficiently different to justify doing something about it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:56:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1214 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT Certified Service Manager: a cat amongst the ITIL pigeons</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-certified-service-manager-cat-amongst-itil-p</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s hoping the upcoming (any day now, apparently) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itgi.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home&amp;amp;CONTENTID=19907&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm#Project10&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt;COBIT User&#039;s Guide for Service Managers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is closely followed by a certification.   Imagine &quot;COBIT Certified Service Manager&quot;.  Wouldn&#039;t that put a cat amongst the ITIL pigeons?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-certified-service-manager-cat-amongst-itil-p#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:05:56 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1181 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Certification via online training is back on again</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[This post has been rewritten.  I got it wrong and it contained errors of fact.  So one or two of the comments don&#039;t quite follow on from the revised text]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call of a crow!!*   What is going on in Castle ITIL?   Is there a battle royal between vendor factions?  The whole V3 Certification thing is lurching around like a pantomime donkey where the front guy has flatulence.  e-learning is now in the syllabus (I am told but cannot confirm that it was not explicitly specified previously).  This leads to a dire prediction for ATOs if Castle ITIL decides to cut out the middleman...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:59:12 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1187 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 love takes time</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-love-takes-time</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic is not anti-ITIL V3.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.certification.info/2008/10/where-is-love.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ITSM View suggests&lt;/a&gt; &quot;There are plenty out there that are seemingly wanting to derail ITIL v3&quot;.  I&#039;m not one of them.  Nor can I think of anyone who is.  That blog post has the heading &quot;Where is the love?&quot;.  Let us not confuse reluctance to leap immediately into bed with active animosity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-love-takes-time&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-love-takes-time#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:24:11 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1200 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Excellent ITIL V2 and V3 certification training credits calculator</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-itil-v2-and-v3-certification-training-cr</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itil-officialsite.com/itilmapping/v2/map.asp&quot; target=_blank&quot;&gt;an excellent online credit calculator &lt;/a&gt; on APMG&#039;s ITIL Official Site that I hadn&#039;t noticed before (thanks &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi-forum.org/forum12/435.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to Rocky K.K. Lam&lt;/a&gt;) .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-itil-v2-and-v3-certification-training-cr&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-itil-v2-and-v3-certification-training-cr#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:20:54 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1194 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
