vendors

ITIL v3 has shed the down-home, amateur grittiness that provided its appeal, as I wrote recently in ITSM Watch.

Its new commercialism might help ITIL’s appeal in some sectors but it diminishes it in others. While the largest organisations and the Service Management zealots have all embraced ITIL v3 with fervour, many of the less obsessive are lukewarm in their enthusiasm for v3.

Further to my posts on Vendor marketeers stretch to reach out for ITIL and It is a helpdesk so it must be ITIL, see my just-published article on ITSMWatch How Software Vendors Lie About ITIL Support [I didn't write the title :-D]

There are varying degrees of point-stretchedness, with so many products that claim to "deliver" or "support" or "monitor" ITIL.

When I was at CA, they were pretty good at acquisition of companies. HP struggles.

Software vendors love the old bait-and-switch. Readers are invited to contribute examples.

CMDB vendor proponents are often full of wind but this one is blowing a gale. What are they smokin' over at Managed Objects?

It genuinely makes the IT Skeptic sorry to say that a major ITSM content vendor has seemingly stolen my content. This kind of thing shouldn't happen. Be aware that Two Hills actively polices our intellectual property and will aggressively defend it.

This post has been podcast
Now that OGC have outsourced ITIL certification and trainer accreditation to APMG, a private for-profit company, let us look at the people who influence the shape of ITIL V3's slowly emerging qualifications system.

The governing body advising APMG, the "senior examiners", is mostly made up of the biggest vendors. Check out the names:

The CMDB Federation was formed in April 2006 by CMDB vendors so they could tell people they were moving towards a common standard of interoperability, known in the CMDB world as "federation", so the group is called the Federation. Two years later what have we got to show? Glacial advance. That's the way the vendors want it.